EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

Back

Athletic groin pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical versus physical therapy rehabilitation outcomes

Athletic groin pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical versus physical therapy rehabilitation outcomes Athletic groin pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical versus physical therapy rehabilitation outcomes
Athletic groin pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical versus physical therapy rehabilitation outcomes Athletic groin pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical versus physical therapy rehabilitation outcomes

Athletic groin pain (AGP) is an encompassing term for the multitude of chronic conditions presenting as pain in the inguinal region.

See All

Key take away

The findings in this review shows that rehabilitation is a more effective treatment for Athletic groin pain (AGP) in comparison to surgical treatment with comparable RTPrate between surgical and rehabilitative interventions.

Background

Athletic groin pain (AGP) is an encompassing term for the multitude of chronic conditions presenting as pain in the inguinal region. The purpose of this review was to compare the return to play rates (RTPrate) and return to play times (RTPtime) between surgical and rehabilitation interventions in the treatment of AGP.

Method

A systematic review of English language peer review journals was carried out between 1980 to June 2013 using PubMed, Embase, CINHAL and Google Scholar searching for all papers relating to AGP (and its various pseudonyms) and all surgical and rehabilitative interventions which reported RTPrate and/or RTPtime. AGP literature has been subdivided by many eponymous diagnoses but anatomical diagnostic groupings of (1) abdominal wall, (2) adductor and (3) pubic related pain were used in this review. Meta-analysis was then carried out on the data to compare results between the surgical and rehabilitation groups.

Result

Fifty-six papers out of the 561 discovered in the initial search were included in the review with 3332 athletes included. Evidence was mostly level IV. Using the Black and Downs checklist we found poor study quality overall with a high risk of bias especially among surgical studies. The results showed comparable RTPrate between surgical and rehabilitative interventions within the three diagnostic groups. Rehabilitation had significantly quicker RTPtime for pubic related groin pain compared to surgery (10.5 weeks and 23.1 weeks respectively). The abdominal group had the fastest return of the three groups for the rehabilitation and surgery.

Conclusion

The review suggested better outcomes with rehabilitation for pubic-related groin pain with no difference between the adductor and abdominal groups. The review highlighted the poor quality and risk of bias in the literature making accurate comparison difficult.

Source:

Br J Sports Med  2015; 49:1447-1451 

Article:

Athletic groin pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical versus physical therapy rehabilitation outcomes

Authors:

E King et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies ru en
Try: